Type DeSci DAO — climate biote…since 24 September 2025 (read 18 September 2026) Token GROW … (self-reported) Portfolio 6 funded projects & spinouts (3 research grants, 3 spinouts); stated cap 5 funded projects & spinoutson its projects page (https://www.valleydao.bio/projects) (3 crowdfunded research grants, 3 spinouts), though its homepage counter still reads 5; grants of up to $200k, target <2 months to decision00k in under 2 months, though Cocoa ZERO was funded at $300,000 (read 18 September 2026) Ecosystem Bio Protocol (/wi…io (https://www.valleydao.bio)

The GROW token and governance … put to holders since (read 8 and again 18 September 2026). Because Valle…s) rather than market-making.

Type DeSci DAO — climate biote…ations Governance Two-tier — Discourseforum discussion → Snapshotvalleybio.eth (https://snapshot.org) votebox/#/s:valleybio.eth) on Snapshot: 20 proposals, 63 followers, quorum 3,005,000 GROW, no ballot since 24 September 2025 (read 8 September 2026) Token GROW (Ethereum, Base, …4M (self-reported) Portfolio 6 funded projects & spinouts (3 research grants, 3 spinouts); stated cap 5 funded projects & spinouts; …, target <2 months to decision00k in under 2 months, though Cocoa ZERO was funded at 00,000 Ecosystem Bio Protocol (/wi…io (https://www.valleydao.bio)

Mission and focus ValleyDAO fr…y the community, and funded only if a token-holders vote to back them— a route that has produced twenty ballots since May 2023 and none since 24 September 2025 (https://snapshot.box/#/s:valleybio.eth/proposal/0xa5af28829eab9fe70aef2e37d3c1e9f3bfc426bf04ff8a773f596f55269083c0) . This narrows the broad DeSci…flow back to the DAO treasury.

The GROW token and governance …. Governance runs in two tiers, a pattern common across BioDAOs: proposals are first discussed on a Discourse forum (https://snapshot.org) where members give feedback and refine terms, then move to Snapshot (https://snapshot.org: a forum round for discussion, then a binding token-weighted ballot on Snapshot (/wiki/dao-governance/tooling/voting/snapshot) . The Snapshot half is concrete and checkable — the space is valleybio.eth (https://snapshot.box/#/s:valleybio.eth) , symbol GROW, 63 followers and 20 proposals, quorum 3,005,000 GROW, with voting power folded from GROW and vGROW balances through Snapshot's with-delegation wrapper (read 8 September 2026). The forum half is the part that has moved, and the DAO's own record is the only place it is written down. VIP-2, the governance framework (https://snapshot.box/#/s:valleybio.eth/proposal/0x73b3cf4c3cc7b5244e240be34e9c6a64c4927706073b05f5df37441685be4d92) , put phase-2 discussion on a Discourse at gov.valleydao.bio. On 24 November 2023 the DAO passed VIP-2 Amendment: Replace Discourse with Samudai for Phase 2 Governance (https://snapshot.box/#/s:valleybio.eth/proposal/0x0d36609829cb955e6bbfd4526a19bec3e87b4be8016b513b793e7f2957210130) — 6,369,311 GROW for, 11,572 against, 5,199 abstaining, on 12 ballots — resolving to move discussion to Samudai once the team had finished testing the platform. It never happened. Every later proposal that names a discussion venue names something else: VIP-8, VIP-10, VIP-12 and VIP-13 (February to December 2024) link back to the Discourse the amendment retired, VIP-14 and VIP-15 (January and May 2025) link a Discord channel, and both 2025 Tattva ballots link Common (https://common.xyz/valleydao/) , which is also the forum ValleyDAO's own site links from its navigation. No proposal in the space has ever linked Samudai. Samudai itself is gone: samudai.xyz answers HTTP 200 with a GoDaddy parking lander, and the last Wayback capture of the real site is 4 June 2025. So is the Discourse: gov.valleydao.bio still resolves to 164.92.253.15 but accepts no connection on either port, and was last archived alive on 29 January 2026. The ballot has been quiet since. Twenty proposals have closed in the space's history, drawing between 7 and 18 voters each, and the most recent closed on 24 September 2025 — a re-run. VP16, funding the Tattva spinout (https://snapshot.box/#/s:valleybio.eth/proposal/0xac9b127009df422cdfc00fb45b3c085ecb63cea0a13da12f79f3afe68bd1de2c) , for binding token-weighted votesirst closed on 22 September 2025 at 2,266,224 GROW against a 3,005,000 quorum, of which 2,128,910 was abstain and 137,315 was for; the re-issued ballot (https://snapshot.box/#/s:valleybio.eth/proposal/0xa5af28829eab9fe70aef2e37d3c1e9f3bfc426bf04ff8a773f596f55269083c0) , whose own text gives the reason as “not reaching quorum”, closed two days later at 4,128,731 for, 3,463,612 abstaining and none against, on 14 votes. Nothing has been put to holders since (read 8 September 2026). Because ValleyDAO sits insid…s) rather than market-making.

How Caper approaches this Vall… assemble four tools to do it. There is a second difference the Samudai amendment illustrates: a Snapshot result is a signal that someone still has to act on, and a resolution nobody enacts leaves no trace except in the proposals that quietly keep using the old venue. A caper's proposal kinds settle on chain instead — a passed PAYOUT is executed by execute_proposal_payout against the recipient and amount stored when the proposal was raised (contracts/logic/src/lib.rs), so the executor cannot re-target it and cannot decline to run it without that being visible as an unexecuted proposal. The mission is shared — get c…nd the difference is packaging plus enforcement.

How Caper approaches this Vall… ( PAYOUT / INVEST / DIVEST / VOTEMETADATA (/wiki/governance/proposals) …d the difference is packaging.

Place in the Bio Protocol ecosystem ValleyDAO is one of the 11+ specialized BioDAOs incubated byten BioDAOs on Bio Protocol (/wiki/desci/ecosystem/bio-xyz) 's own ecosystem listing (https://www.bio.xyz/) (read 25 August 2026), alongside VitaDAO (/wiki/de…/ecosystem/bio-xyz) overview.

How Caper approaches this Vall…ipation-weighted exit (/wiki/governance/executionfoundations/leaving-a-caper) – whose treasury share is t…d the difference is packaging.

How Caper approaches this Vall…sal system ( PAYOUT / INVEST / DIVEST / VOTE (/wiki/governance/propos…d the difference is packaging.

Type DeSci DAO — climate biote…Base, Solana) Holders 1,200+ (self-reported)GROW holders; 4,000+ community members (self-reported) Treasury ~$4M (self-reported) Portfolio 5 funded projects & spinouts; grants up to $200k, target <2 months to decision Ecosystem Bio Protocol (/wi…io (https://www.valleydao.bio)

The GROW token and governance …tion and governance (/wiki/daos-governance/concepts/fundamentals/dao-gov…s) rather than market-making.

Research funded: the SavedApe …fice or a downstream acquirer. The portfolio has since widened well past that first mint, and the funding labels on ValleyDAO's own projects page (https://www.valleydao.bio/projects) now split it in two. Three are community-funded research grants: Cocoa ZERO ($300,000), Ledesma-Amaro's follow-on at Imperial growing cocoa lipids by precision fermentation to about 90% of cocoa butter; Forge ($200,000), Dr Anna Kaksonen's integrated biomining work at CSIRO turning electronic waste into a domestic source of critical minerals; and Hempy ($115,000), Prof. Georg Gübitz's enzymatic softening of hemp fibre at the Austrian Centre of Industrial Biotechnology. Three are spinouts carrying conventional equity: Tattva ($70,000 equity financing), engineering cyanobacteria into carbon-negative construction materials; BioHalo ($1.9M raised externally), precision biohalogenation aimed at biodegradable substitutes for PFAS fluoropolymers; and SynbioCAD, an AI strain-design platform still in incubation. That split is the interesting part. The IP-NFT is the instrument for the research tranche; once a project becomes a company, ValleyDAO's exposure runs through ordinary equity instead – the same coin-to-company transition (/wiki/desci/ip-nfts) that Molecule's own documentation now makes explicit across DeSci, where tokens confer no legal ownership and a shareholding is acquired off-chain.

How Caper approaches this Vall…overnance/proposals) ) and a pro-rataarticipation-weighted exit (/wiki/governance/execution) – whose treasury share is the member's canonical vote weight (t·v)/(V·T), consuming both the governance tokens and the soulbound vote tokens rather than paying out by balance – ship together, so a community…d the difference is packaging.

The GROW token and governance …vernance (/wiki/daos/concepts/fundamentals/dao-governance-models) rather than market-making.

Type DeSci DAO — climate biotech & synthetic biology R&D Focus Funding synthetic biology research with climate and industrial applications Governance Two-tier — Discourse discussion → Snapshot (https://snapshot.org) vote Token GROW (Ethereum, Base, Solana) Holders 1,200+ (self-reported) Ecosystem Bio Protocol (/wiki/desci/ecosystem/bio-xyz) BioDAO IP framework Molecule (/wiki/desci/ecosystem/molecule) IP-NFTs (/wiki/desci/ip-nfts) First IP-NFT "SavedApe" — microbial lipid production, Imperial College London (Aug 2023) Website valleydao.bio (https://www.valleydao.bio)

Overview ValleyDAO is a decentralized science (DeSci) (/wiki/desci/what-is-desci) organization that funds synthetic biology research with climate and industrial applications (https://www.valleydao.bio) — engineering biological systems (microbes, yeasts, enzymes) to make materials and chemicals that today depend on fossil inputs. It operates as a BioDAO within the Bio Protocol (/wiki/desci/ecosystem/bio-xyz) ecosystem, using the same Molecule (/wiki/desci/ecosystem/molecule) tokenization stack as sibling BioDAOs such as VitaDAO (/wiki/desci/ecosystem/vitadao) and CryoDAO (/wiki/desci/ecosystem/cryodao) . The thesis is that early-stage synthetic biology is chronically under-funded by traditional grants and venture capital: promising academic work stalls in the "valley of death" between a publication and a fundable company. ValleyDAO routes community capital directly to that stage in exchange for a governed share of any resulting intellectual property.

Mission and focus ValleyDAO frames its pipeline as climate biotech (https://www.valleydao.bio/grow) — research where engineered biology can displace a carbon-intensive incumbent process. Representative directions include microbial production of oils, proteins and biodegradable materials, carbon-capturing organisms, and fermentation routes to industrial chemicals. Projects are sourced from academic labs, reviewed by the community, and funded only if token holders vote to back them. This narrows the broad DeSci mandate: where VitaDAO (/wiki/desci/ecosystem/vitadao) funds longevity and CryoDAO (/wiki/desci/ecosystem/cryodao) funds cryopreservation, ValleyDAO concentrates on synthetic biology with a commercial and environmental payoff, so that licensing income or startup equity can flow back to the DAO treasury.

The GROW token and governance GROW (https://www.valleydao.bio/grow) is ValleyDAO's governance token, deployed across Ethereum, Base and Solana with 1,200+ reported holders. It carries two rights: voting on which research proposals the DAO funds and how the resulting IP-NFTs (/wiki/desci/ip-nfts) are licensed, and — via those IP-NFTs — a claim on downstream proceeds if a funded project generates licensing revenue or equity. Governance runs in two tiers, a pattern common across BioDAOs: proposals are first discussed on a Discourse forum (https://snapshot.org) where members give feedback and refine terms, then move to Snapshot (https://snapshot.org) for binding token-weighted votes. Because ValleyDAO sits inside Bio Protocol (/wiki/desci/ecosystem/bio-xyz) , secondary-market liquidity for GROW is managed at the protocol layer rather than by the DAO itself — a division of labour that lets the DAO concentrate on curation and governance (/wiki/daos/concepts/dao-governance-models) rather than market-making.

Research funded: the SavedApe IP-NFT ValleyDAO's first funded project, minted as the "SavedApe" IP-NFT (https://molecule.xyz/blog/valleydao-imperial-college-london) in August 2023, backed Dr Rodrigo Ledesma-Amaro's lab at Imperial College London (https://molecule.xyz/blog/valleydao-imperial-college-london) with £228,000 to engineer the oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica for sustainable, industrial-scale production of oils — a route to replacing extractive or fossil-derived lipids used across food, cosmetics and biofuels. The intellectual property from the work is held in an IP-NFT (/wiki/desci/ecosystem/molecule) whose licensing and commercialization the DAO governs with GROW. This is the mechanism that distinguishes DeSci funding from a grant: the community that pays for the research retains a durable, tradable stake in whatever it produces, rather than handing the upside to a university tech-transfer office or a downstream acquirer.

Place in the Bio Protocol ecosystem ValleyDAO is one of the 11+ specialized BioDAOs incubated by Bio Protocol (/wiki/desci/ecosystem/bio-xyz) , alongside VitaDAO (/wiki/desci/ecosystem/vitadao) (longevity), AthenaDAO (/wiki/desci/ecosystem/athenadao) (women's health), PsyDAO (/wiki/desci/ecosystem/psydao) (psychedelic science) and CryoDAO (/wiki/desci/ecosystem/cryodao) (cryopreservation). Each is a domain-specific fund with its own token and treasury, while Bio Protocol supplies the shared launchpad, curation market (staking BIO to admit new DAOs) and liquidity layer. For a fuller map of how these pieces fit together, see What is DeSci (/wiki/desci/what-is-desci) , IP-NFTs (/wiki/desci/ip-nfts) and the Bio Protocol (/wiki/desci/ecosystem/bio-xyz) overview.

How Caper approaches this ValleyDAO shows the BioDAO shape at work: a specialized community raises a token, funds research, and governs the resulting IP — but it leans on Bio Protocol for the launchpad and on Molecule for the IP-NFT layer, and on Discourse plus Snapshot for governance. A caper (/wiki/foundations/what-is-a-caper) folds those separate layers into one primitive: the raise (a bonding curve (/wiki/markets/bonding-curve) ), the treasury, the on-chain proposal system ( PAYOUT / INVEST / VOTE (/wiki/governance/proposals) ) and a pro-rata exit (/wiki/governance/execution) ship together, so a community funding a project does not have to assemble four tools to do it. The mission is shared — get capital to under-funded work and let the people who funded it keep a real stake — and the difference is packaging.