History – ENS DAO

Back
v2.3.4 · currentEm dashes become spaced en dashes (VOICE.md); dashes inside quotes kept–
1 block modified
  • Modified – Text at Block 2

    The ENS DAO governs the Ether…m proposal drama. - EP 6.45 —– Renewal of the Security Counc…emium auction, commit-reveal).

v2.3.3Em dashes become spaced en dashes (VOICE.md); dashes inside quotes and source titles kept–
2 blocks modified
  • Modified – Text at Block 1 → Block 1

    Name ENS DAO Type Protocol DA… (https://ens.domains/ensv2) —– deploying on Ethereum mainnet… (/wiki/daos/dexs/uniswap-dao)

  • Modified – Text at Block 2

    The ENS DAO governs the Ether…equently cited as a benchmark —– and, in 2026, as a cautionary… protection for everyone else —– the same dynamic documented a…NS's technical roadmap. ENSv2 —– a ground-up rewrite of the E…bility, and developer tooling —– was originally meant to live …irst decided to pursue an L2" —– the base layer had scaled eno…tack-johnson-self-delegates) —– ENS delegates call the Founda…ance-reform-proposal-drama/) —– ENS DAO governance reform pro…-new-security-council/22272) —– the executable, with the depl…emium auction, commit-reveal).

v2.3.2Split paragraphs over 150 words at sentence boundaries; wording unchanged.–
1 block modified
  • Modified – Text at Block 2

    The ENS DAO governs the Ether…the-evolved-ens-foundation) ).The delegate Curia voted again…ved ENSv2 to Ethereum mainnet.Nick Johnson's framing: "the l… measured before ENS launched.Harry Kalodner, Miles Carlsten…emium auction, commit-reveal).

v2.3.1Reworded the registrar sentence so it no longer attributes the comparison to the Namecoin paper; the mechanisms are sourced to the ENS registrar documentation.–
1 block modified
  • Modified – Text at Block 2

    The ENS DAO governs the Ether…realised. The .eth registrar uses four mechanisms the paper weighedaddresses the same allocation problem with four mechanisms ( ETH registrar documentation…emium auction, commit-reveal).

v2.3.0Added a section on how the DAO prices names, from Article II of the ENS constitution, the ETH registrar documentation and Kalodner et al.'s 2015 empirical study of Namecoin, with references.–
1 block modified
  • Modified – Text at Block 2

    The ENS DAO governs the Ether… ecosystem shifted under it. Pricing names The DAO's constitution says what registration fees are for. Article II of the ENS DAO constitution (https://docs.ens.domains/dao/constitution/) makes their primary purpose preventing the namespace from being overwhelmed by speculatively registered names, with funding the DAO second, and its examples allow governance to raise prices for either reason. The failure that article guards against had been measured before ENS launched. Harry Kalodner, Miles Carlsten, Paul Ellenbogen, Joseph Bonneau and Arvind Narayanan studied Namecoin, the first fork of Bitcoin with its own blockchain, which runs a decentralised registry for .bit domain names ( An empirical study of Namecoin and lessons for decentralized namespace design (https://www.cs.princeton.edu/~arvindn/publications/namespaces.pdf) , 2015). Of roughly 120,000 registered names they found 28 that were not squatted (held unused, usually for resale) and had nontrivial content. They found evidence of at most about 250 sales of names in Namecoin's history, and concluded that allocating the scarce supply of memorable names is a mechanism-design problem far harder than had been realised. The .eth registrar uses four mechanisms the paper weighed ( ETH registrar documentation (https://docs.ens.domains/registry/eth/) ). Names are leased by the year and priced by length: $5 a year for five characters or more, $160 for four and $640 for three, paid in ETH to the DAO's treasury. A name that expires and passes its 90-day grace period returns through a 21-day Dutch auction, in which a premium starting near $100m falls towards zero until someone registers the name. Registration is split into a commit and a reveal at least 60 seconds apart, so nobody watching pending transactions can register the name first. How Caper approaches this ENS…d contract and Safe addresses. - Harry Kalodner, Miles Carlsten, Paul Ellenbogen, Joseph Bonneau and Arvind Narayanan, An empirical study of Namecoin and lessons for decentralized namespace design (https://www.cs.princeton.edu/~arvindn/publications/namespaces.pdf) (Workshop on the Economics of Information Security, 2015). - ENS DAO constitution (https://docs.ens.domains/dao/constitution/) (Article II, fees) and ENS docs: ETH registrar (https://docs.ens.domains/registry/eth/) (pricing, premium auction, commit-reveal).

v2.2.1Replace the July 2026 composite treasury figure with the endowment NAV from Newsletter #120–
2 blocks modified
  • Modified – Text at Block 1 → Block 1

    Name ENS DAO Type Protocol DA…anaged by Karpatkey Treasury Roughly $350 million including ENS tokens (~$88M excluding them), July 2026Endowment NAV $93M at a 3.08% blended APY, August 2026 ( Newsletter #120 (https://discuss.ens.domains/t/ens-dao-newsletter-120-09-15-2026/22425) ); the DAO separately holds 54.6% of ENS supply, whose dollar value moves with the token Primary sources discuss.ens… (/wiki/daos/dexs/uniswap-dao)

  • Modified – Text at Block 2

    The ENS DAO governs the Ether…fe had moved to the Foundation, and the same newsletter put the endowment’s NAV at $93M, with August strategy earnings of $223K at a 3.08% blended APY and premium sales of $113K ( Newsletter #120 (https://di…d contract and Safe addresses.

v2.2.0Structure: one working group since Term 7; the executed Foundation proposal (board, endowment timelock, 1m ENS transfer, executive director) (run #425)–
2 blocks modified
  • Modified – Text at Block 1 → Block 1

    Name ENS DAO Type Protocol DA…ped November 2021) Structure WOne working groups + a (Meta-Governance) since July 2026; the Cayman-based ENS Foundation ….ens.domains/dao/foundation/) , the DAO's operating arm since August 2026; an endowment managed by Karp… (/wiki/daos/dexs/uniswap-dao)

  • Modified – Text at Block 2

    The ENS DAO governs the Ether…ds work through working groups (such as Public Goods and Ecosystem) and, and since Term 7 began on 1 July 2026 it has run one. The EP 6.44 Snapshot vote (https://snapshot.box/#/s:ens.eth/proposal/0xe4e1c052b2ea4f640cab27ddec326df6290d8996a9219b60cda4c4d4509f5f9a) ranked “Metagov only” first, and the Term 7 election (https://snapshot.box/#/s:ens.eth/proposal/0xa736ce4411be14ceaab141989ac271ce1ca96aee6d3ac26bb893ec3c898385d0) seated three Meta-Governance stewards: netto.eth, sovereignsignal.eth and abdullahumar.eth. The Ecosystem and Public Goods groups dissolved, and the stewards are still settling how much of their funding and grants work Meta-Governance takes on ( Meta-Gov minutes, 21 August 2026 (https://discuss.ens.domains/t/meta-gov-working-group-term-7-meetings-thursday-4pm-utc-bi-weekly/22280/7) ). The DAO also holds an endowment managed by…O contract with the real world; the Foundation's directors handle day-to-day operations while remaining removable by token-holder vote. ( ENS Foundation —– ENS docs (https://docs.ens.do…c and wrote the answer down. The Foundation question reached the same governor in August, revised after its temp check. The executable (https://www.tally.xyz/gov/ens/proposal/80619211450810140112687536515944199882433060764177806587986222097717655810120) made the ENS Foundation the DAO's operating arm, with a full-time executive director, staff and a five-member board that token holders appoint and can remove. The endowment keeps its assets in place, but its transactions now pass through a nine-day timelock in which the Security Council can cancel anything outside the Foundation's mandate. The DAO keeps its ENS, 54.6% of total supply, apart from a one-time transfer of 1m ENS to the Foundation for employee compensation ( ENS blog (https://ens.domains/blog/post/introducing-the-evolved-ens-foundation) ). The delegate Curia voted against because, after execution, the DAO holds no role on that new endowment timelock ( forum thread (https://discuss.ens.domains/t/draft-executable-next-era-of-ens-dao-empowering-the-ens-foundation/22329) ). The proposal was executed, and Alexander Urbelis became the Foundation's first executive director ( ENS DAO Newsletter #118 (https://discuss.ens.domains/t/ens-dao-newsletter-118-08-15-2026/22359) ). By 15 September custody of the endowment Safe had moved to the Foundation ( Newsletter #120 (https://discuss.ens.domains/t/ens-dao-newsletter-120-09-15-2026/22425) ). Why it matters The episode is…d contract and Safe addresses.

v2.1.0Sweep #413 (daos): corrected for the 11 September 2026 redeploy – v is minted only by a ballot (trades mint none), so the exit opens to members who have voted, not to anyone who 'voted or traded'; exit withdraws amounts from the member's own account rather than taking buckets; 'pro-rata' dropped where the share is the canonical weight (t·v)/(V·T), not a slice by balance. Verified at contracts/logic/src/lib.rs (VOTE_MINT :211, exit :2229-2238) at HEAD 34ac4d4 and the live CaperMain component_tdx_2_1cq64v5tw…jjflhcr. 1 span(s) on this page.–
1 block modified
  • Modified – Text at Block 2

    The ENS DAO governs the Ether…lets any member who has voted or traded redeem a treasury share sized …d contract and Safe addresses.

v2.0.2Exit is not gated on having voted: exit() (contracts/logic/src/lib.rs:2326) requires only a non-zero vote-token and governance-token bucket, and v is minted by trading (:1179, :971) as well as by voting (:1719).–
1 block modified
  • Modified – Text at Block 2

    The ENS DAO governs the Ether…lets any member who has voted or traded redeem a treasury share sized …d contract and Safe addresses.

v2.0.1Repoint "exit" anchors from /wiki/governance/execution to /wiki/foundations/leaving-a-caper: the execution page documents proposal release/finalize/execute and never uses the word "exit"; the exit right lives on leaving-a-caper.–
1 block modified
  • Modified – Text at Block 2

    The ENS DAO governs the Ether…; and a built-in exit (/wiki/governance/executionfoundations/leaving-a-caper) right that lets any member …d contract and Safe addresses.

v1.1.0Accuracy (contract): the exit right is conditional on participation. exit() asserts a non-empty vote-token bucket (contracts/logic/src/lib.rs:2087) and vote tokens are soulbound, minted one per ballot, so a holder who never voted has no exit at all rather than a zero-valued one. Batch correction of the 'every/any holder can exit' class, found DB-wide by the tag-stripping probe.–
1 block modified
  • Modified – Text at Block 2

    The ENS DAO governs the Ether…) right that lets any member who has voted redeem a treasury share sized …d contract and Safe addresses.

v2.0.0Correct the 2026 governance-battle section against primaries: the on-chain renewal vote ran 29 June - 6 July 2026 (governor snapshot/deadline blocks) and was defeated 3,859,981-1,137,702, not ended 30 June; katherine.eth's replacement framework was posted 30 June while that vote was still live, not hours after it failed; nominations closed 6 July, not 3 July. Adds the outcome the page never carried (election, executable, council live at 5-of-8 to 16 July 2028, verified on-chain) and an internal link to the security-councils pillar.–
1 block modified
  • Modified – Text at Block 2

    The ENS DAO governs the Ether…t-discussed governance dispute. , and the record of it is unusually complete: every step ran through the DAO's own forum, Snapshot space, and governor contract. On 19 June a proposal introduc…ants, and treasury management —– the operational wallet, the D…e Karpatkey-managed endowment —– to a five-seat ENS Foundation board. In parallel, an on-chain vote to renew the DAO's Security Council failed. ENS founder andthe DAO was voting on whether to renew its Security Council (/wiki/dao-governance/concepts/fundamentals/security-councils) , the 4-of-8 multisig whose single power is to cancel a proposal already sitting in the timelock. The two questions were inseparable: a council empowered to cancel a passed proposal could, in principle, cancel that one. The advisory Snapshot vote (https://snapshot.box/#/s:ens.eth/proposal/0x9ed89cf79760eb92d220fee2da08896bf027317f394aab87863011f964e19453) on renewal (23–28 June, 73 voters) read as a clear pass: 1,274,195 ENS for to 85,204 against. It also carried 3,386,139 ENS abstaining – 71% of everything cast – of which 3,261,042 came from a single voter, ENS lead developer N nick Johnson then self-delegated roughly half of the active voting supply to block.eth (https://api.ensdata.net/0xb8c2C29ee19D8307cb7255e1Cd9CbDE883A267d5) , whose self-delegation that month was itself the subject of the dispute ( The Defiant (https://thedefiant.io/news/defi/ens-dao-delegates-governance-attack-johnson-self-delegates) ). The binding vote went the other way. Read from the ENS Governor (https://etherscan.io/address/0x323A76393544d5ecca80cd6ef2A560C6a395b7E3) , the Sexecurity Council renewal; the on-chain vote table that would have granted the renewed council its cancel role opended on 30 June 2026. Hours after the renewal failed, katherine.eth introduced a replacement plan: an eight-member council with the supermajority needed to cancel timelocked proposals raised to 5-of-8 (from 4-of-8), public mandates for members, and a removal mechanism — with nominations open until 3 July 2026. ( The Defiant (https://thedefiant.io/news/defi/ens-dao-delegates-governance-attack-johnson-self-delegates) ; Cryptopolitan (https://www.cryptopolitan.com/ens-dao-governance-reform-proposal-drama/) )at block 25,424,114 (29 June 2026, 15:07 UTC) and closed at block 25,469,932 (6 July 2026, 00:34 UTC), and it was defeated (https://www.tally.xyz/gov/ens/proposal/45402179622316441394139979097514597399865468312011562941203078514615705423505) 3,859,981 ENS against to 1,137,702 for. The DAO's advisory instrument and its binding one had pointed in opposite directions. The replacement was tabled while that vote was still running, not after it. On 30 June katherine.eth posted a framework for a new council (https://discuss.ens.domains/t/draft-social-proposal-for-a-new-security-council/22219) : eight members, the threshold for any cancellation raised from 4-of-8 to 5-of-8, a tighter written mandate, a public pledge each nominee must affirm, a removal mechanism for members who act outside it, and an Appointment Agreement with the ENS Foundation drafted by counsel – with the scope of authority deliberately unchanged, “cancellation of timelocked proposals, nothing more”. Nominations were open to anyone and closed on 6 July. Eight of fifteen candidates were elected in a Copeland-method vote (https://snapshot.box/#/s:ens.eth/proposal/0x3e7acd4a47b246382bf9a3aeb71d0fd1562d38dbb9f7b7760445cf9731229b9d) (7–12 July, 50 voters), and the executable seating them (https://discuss.ens.domains/t/executable-establishing-a-new-security-council/22272) passed 4,228,716 to 94,526. As of 8 August 2026 the outcome is verifiable on-chain: the new council contract (https://etherscan.io/address/0x2acBf518b3759f6e1fA163294eda55bF1d0ae051) holds PROPOSER_ROLE on the DAO timelock (https://etherscan.io/address/0xFe89cc7aBB2C4183683ab71653C4cdc9B02D44b7) , its owner Safe (https://etherscan.io/address/0x7101B78638e34444F0a5AdE9e1149fbEeC029931) reports a threshold of 5 over 8 owners, and the term runs to 16 July 2028, when the same expiry logic fires again. ENS did not lose its veto and did not simply renew it; it made the body re-argue its mandate in public and wrote the answer down. Why it matters The episode …ernance reform proposal drama. - EP 6.45 — Renewal of the Security Council (https://discuss.ens.domains/t/6-45-renewal-of-the-security-council/22145) , the renewal thread carrying the mandate argument in full. - Establishing a new Security Council (https://discuss.ens.domains/t/executable-establishing-a-new-security-council/22272) — the executable, with the deployed contract and Safe addresses.

v1.0.0Accuracy: a caper's exit share is the canonical vote weight (t·v)/(V·T) over governance tokens and the soulbound vote record, not a flat pro-rata split. Verified against exit()/compute_vote_weight() in contracts/logic/src/lib.rs.–
2 blocks modified
  • Modified – Text at Block 1 → Block 1

    Name ENS DAO Type Protocol DA…ted What is a DAO? (/wiki/daos-governance/concepts/fundamentals/what-is… Governance models (/wiki/daos-governance/concepts/fundamentals/dao-gov…odels) , Uniswap (/wiki/daos/organizations/dexs/uniswap-dao)

  • Modified – Text at Block 2

    The ENS DAO governs the Ether…power concentration (/wiki/daos-governance/concepts/fundamentals/dao-gov…ken-weighted voting (/wiki/daos-governance/concepts/fundamentals/dao-gov…t that lets any member redeem their pro-ra treasury share sized by thata share of the treasuryame participation-weighted vote weight rather than be locked in unde…ernance reform proposal drama.

v1.0.0Repoint DAO links to canonical taxonomy paths (2026-07-17 split)–
2 blocks modified
  • Modified – Text at Block 1 → Block 1

    Name ENS DAO Type Protocol DA…ted What is a DAO? (/wiki/daos/concepts/fundamentals/what-is-a-dao) , Governance models (/wiki/daos/concepts/fundamentals/dao-governance-models) , Uniswap (/wiki/dao/ecosystems/organizations/dexs/uniswap-dao)

  • Modified – Text at Block 2

    The ENS DAO governs the Ether…power concentration (/wiki/daos/concepts/fundamentals/dao-governance-models) . Stru…ken-weighted voting (/wiki/daos/concepts/fundamentals/dao-governance-models) : when …ernance reform proposal drama.

v1.0.0Staleness refresh (stalest dao/ecosystem page): add ENSv2 + scrapped-Namechain-L2 roadmap section (Feb-2026 pivot to Ethereum mainnet, Nick Johnson/Vitalik L1-scaling framing) + infobox roadmap row.–
2 blocks modified
  • Modified – Text at Block 1 → Block 1

    Name ENS DAO Type Protocol DA…ce (.eth names and identity) Protocol roadmap ENSv2 (https://ens.domains/ensv2) — deploying on Ethereum mainnet after the Feb-2026 Namechain L2 cancellation (https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2026/02/06/ethereum-s-ens-identity-system-scraps-planned-rollup-amid-vitalik-s-warning-about-layer-2-networks) Governance token ENS (airdropp…iki/dao/ecosystem/uniswap-dao)

  • Modified – Text at Block 2

    The ENS DAO governs the Ether…o-empower-ens-foundation/) ) ENSv2 and the scrapped Namechain L2 Beyond governance, 2026 also reset ENS's technical roadmap. ENSv2 — a ground-up rewrite of the ENS contracts and architecture (https://ens.domains/ensv2) for better usability, flexibility, and developer tooling — was originally meant to live on Namechain, a dedicated ENS Layer-2 that ENS Labs and the Linea Association agreed to build (https://linea.build/blog/ens-labs-and-linea-association-to-build-namechain) in December 2024. On 5 February 2026 (https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2026/02/06/ethereum-s-ens-identity-system-scraps-planned-rollup-amid-vitalik-s-warning-about-layer-2-networks) ENS Labs scrapped the L2 entirely and moved ENSv2 to Ethereum mainnet. Nick Johnson's framing: "the landscape has changed between when we first decided to pursue an L2" — the base layer had scaled enough (ENS reports ~99% lower registration gas costs over the prior year (https://www.theblock.co/post/388932/ens-labs-scraps-namechain-l2-shifts-ensv2-fully-ethereum-mainnet) alongside Ethereum's 2025 gas-limit rise) to make a separate rollup's cost savings no longer worth its complexity, echoing Vitalik Buterin's renewed emphasis on scaling L1 itself. ENS Labs says roughly 80% of development effort (https://www.theblock.co/post/388932/ens-labs-scraps-namechain-l2-shifts-ensv2-fully-ethereum-mainnet) can now go to ENSv2's core features rather than maintaining custom chain infrastructure. It is a notable case of a DAO-governed protocol reversing a flagship architectural bet as the surrounding ecosystem shifted under it. How Caper approaches this ENS…ernance reform proposal drama.

v1.0.0Add the post-30-June replacement Security Council proposal (8 members, 5-of-8, nominations to 3 July); refine treasury figure–
2 blocks modified
  • Modified – Text at Block 1 → Block 1

    Name ENS DAO Type Protocol DA…naged by Karpatkey Treasury Reported at roughly $3500 million (including ENS tokens (~$88M excluding them), July 2026) Primary sources discuss.ens…iki/dao/ecosystem/uniswap-dao)

  • Modified – Text at Block 2

    The ENS DAO governs the Ether…in vote ended on 30 June 2026. Hours after the renewal failed, katherine.eth introduced a replacement plan: an eight-member council with the supermajority needed to cancel timelocked proposals raised to 5-of-8 (from 4-of-8), public mandates for members, and a removal mechanism — with nominations open until 3 July 2026. ( The Defiant (https://thedef…ernance reform proposal drama.

v1.0.0Create ENS DAO ecosystem page (structure + 2026 governance battle)–
2 blocks added
  • Added – Text at Block 1 → Block 1

    Name ENS DAO Type Protocol DAO (naming / identity) Governs The Ethereum Name Service (.eth names and identity) Governance token ENS (airdropped November 2021) Structure Working groups + a Cayman-based ENS Foundation (https://docs.ens.domains/dao/foundation/) ; an endowment managed by Karpatkey Treasury Reported at roughly $500 million (2026) Primary sources discuss.ens.domains (https://discuss.ens.domains/) , docs.ens.domains (https://docs.ens.domains/) Related What is a DAO? (/wiki/dao/concepts/what-is-a-dao) , Governance models (/wiki/dao/concepts/dao-governance-models) , Uniswap (/wiki/dao/ecosystem/uniswap-dao)

  • Added – Text at Block 2

    The ENS DAO governs the Ethereum Name Service (https://ens.domains/) , the dominant naming and identity layer for Ethereum, which maps human-readable .eth names to wallet addresses and other records. Since a November 2021 airdrop of the ENS token, the protocol's treasury, working groups, and parameters have been governed on-chain by token holders and their delegates. ENS governance is frequently cited as a benchmark — and, in 2026, as a cautionary tale about voting-power concentration (/wiki/dao/concepts/dao-governance-models) . Structure The DAO funds work through working groups (such as Public Goods and Ecosystem) and holds an endowment managed by the asset manager Karpatkey to give it a self-sustaining runway. Its legal interface is the ENS Foundation, a Cayman Islands nonprofit that provides limited liability and lets the DAO contract with the real world; the Foundation's directors handle day-to-day operations while remaining removable by token-holder vote. ( ENS Foundation — ENS docs (https://docs.ens.domains/dao/foundation/) ) The 2026 governance battle In June 2026 ENS became the year's most-discussed governance dispute. On 19 June a proposal introduced by the delegate katherine.eth sought to transfer operational control, grants, and treasury management — the operational wallet, the DAO's ENS holdings, and the Karpatkey-managed endowment — to a five-seat ENS Foundation board. In parallel, an on-chain vote to renew the DAO's Security Council failed. ENS founder and lead developer Nick Johnson then self-delegated roughly half of the active voting supply to block the Security Council renewal; the on-chain vote ended on 30 June 2026. ( The Defiant (https://thedefiant.io/news/defi/ens-dao-delegates-governance-attack-johnson-self-delegates) ; Cryptopolitan (https://www.cryptopolitan.com/ens-dao-governance-reform-proposal-drama/) ) Why it matters The episode is a textbook live case study in plutocracy and capture. One delegate, Lefteris Karapetsas, wrote that Johnson had "delegated ~50% of the voting supply to himself, essentially becoming the DAO," and Security Council member Brantly Millegan called the Foundation proposal "the equivalent of treasury capture by ENS Labs." It crystallizes the core problem of token-weighted voting (/wiki/dao/concepts/dao-governance-models) : when one party can marshal a majority of active votes, the decentralized form offers little protection for everyone else — the same dynamic documented across large DAOs in 2026. ( EtherWorld (https://www.etherworld.co/ens-dao-weighs-major-governance-shift-to-empower-ens-foundation/) ) How Caper approaches this ENS shows what happens when a dominant voter can override a DAO and minority members have no clean way out. A caper (/wiki/foundations/what-is-a-caper) responds with two design choices described on its governance pages: voting weight that grows with demonstrated participation (/wiki/governance/voting) , not stake alone, so influence is harder to simply buy or delegate to oneself; and a built-in exit (/wiki/governance/execution) right that lets any member redeem their pro-rata share of the treasury rather than be locked in under a controlling party. Those mechanics are stated neutrally on the linked Caper pages. References - ENS DAO Governance Forum (https://discuss.ens.domains/) . - ENS docs: The ENS Foundation (https://docs.ens.domains/dao/foundation/) . - The Defiant (https://thedefiant.io/news/defi/ens-dao-delegates-governance-attack-johnson-self-delegates) — ENS delegates call the Foundation proposal a governance attack as Johnson self-delegates. - Cryptopolitan (https://www.cryptopolitan.com/ens-dao-governance-reform-proposal-drama/) — ENS DAO governance reform proposal drama.