History – 1inch DAO (1INCH)

Back
v1.0.7 · currentVote-weight formula replaced with outcome-only wording (VOICE.md §4 Caper overlay)–
1 block modified
  • Modified – Text at Block 8

    How Caper approaches this 1in…r) folds those into a single canonical numberearned weight: a member's vote weight is (t · v) / (V · T) –combines their token holdings t multiplied by v,with the soulbound record their own participation mints – one perby casting ranked ballot casts, and nothing for a buy, a sell or a transfer – over the totals. Holdings are one factor, not…ed in to a decision they lost.

v1.0.6Split paragraphs over 150 words at sentence boundaries; wording unchanged.–
1 block modified
  • Modified – Text at Block 8

    How Caper approaches this 1in… a transfer – over the totals.Holdings are one factor, not t…ed in to a decision they lost.

v1.0.5Trading no longer mints v: correct the vote-mint claim against VOTE_MINT in contracts/logic/src/lib.rs (ballots only; buys, sells and transfers mint zero) after the 11 Sep 2026 genesis redeploy–
1 block modified
  • Modified – Text at Block 8

    How Caper approaches this 1in…e per ranked ballot cast, and 0.01 per XRD of gross value on each legnothing for a buy, a sell ofr a tradensfer – over the totals. Holdings a… that has earned no record – any position transferred in rathwhose holder than bought on the curves never voted – cannot capture control (/w…ed in to a decision they lost.

v1.0.4The exit share is weighted, not proportional (sweep #390)–
1 block modified
  • Modified – Text at Block 8

    How Caper approaches this 1in…mber can always leave with their proportional share of the treasury share their own weight has earned rather than being locked in to a decision they lost.

v1.0.3Correct the exit precondition: v is minted the moment a member trades or votes, with no release step (contracts/logic/src/lib.rs exit(), vote(), buy/sell v accrual)–
1 block modified
  • Modified – Text at Block 8

    How Caper approaches this 1in…oken holdings t multiplied by their accumulated voting history v,v, the soulbound record their own participation mints – one per ranked ballot cast, and 0.01 per XRD of gross value on each leg of a trade – over the totals. Holdings are…ed in to a decision they lost.

v1.0.2Sweep #333: v is minted by trading as well as by voting (0.01/XRD gross on each leg, 1 per ranked ballot, all at the moment of the act) — corrected every clause making a ballot the sole source of weight–
1 block modified
  • Modified – Text at Block 8

    How Caper approaches this 1in…or, not the whole story, so a large bag alone cannot capture control (/wiki/governance) without a matching record of showing up to votebag that has earned no record – a position transferred in rather than bought on the curve – cannot capture control (/wiki/governance) at all. And where 1inch stakers must…ed in to a decision they lost.

v1.0.1Website row and metadata.website 1inch.io -> 1inch.com; 1inch.io 301s to 1inch.com and the page's prose already cited 1inch.com throughout, so the machine-read facts row was the only stale copy.–
3 blocks modified
  • Modified – Text at Block 1 → Block 1

    Organization 1inch DAO Type D…tus 🟢 Active Website 1inch.iocom (https://1inch.iocom)

  • Modified – Text at Block 2

    Overview The 1inch Network is…ated market maker (/wiki/daos/organizations/dexs) , it routes each trade a…y: where Uniswap (/wiki/daos/organizations/dexs/uniswap-dao) , Curve (/wiki/daos/organizations/dexs/curve-dao) , and Balancer (/wiki/daos/organizations/dexs/balancer-dao) govern the…AOs like CoW DAO (/wiki/daos/organizations/dexs/cow-dao) and the Solana …gregator Jupiter (/wiki/daos/organizations/dexs/jupiter) .

  • Modified – Text at Block 6

    Two independent delegations 1…orm of vote-lock (/wiki/daos/organizations/dexs/curve-dao) representatio…o a resolver at the same time.

v1.0.0Create cornerstone 1inch DAO (1INCH) — the DEX-aggregator archetype: dual delegation of Unicorn Power to Snapshot governance vs Fusion resolvers–
8 blocks added
  • Added – Text at Block 1 → Block 1

    Organization 1inch DAO Type DEX aggregator & intent-settlement protocol Token 1INCH (governance + staking) Chains Ethereum + 10+ EVM networks (Aggregation / Limit Order / Fusion) Governance 1inch.eth Snapshot (https://snapshot.org/#/1inch.eth) , weighted by Unicorn Power Founded 2019 (ETHGlobal New York hackathon) Status 🟢 Active Website 1inch.io (https://1inch.io)

  • Added – Text at Block 2

    Overview The 1inch Network is a decentralized-exchange aggregator: rather than running a single automated market maker (/wiki/daos/organizations/dexs) , it routes each trade across many liquidity sources to find the best execution. Its Aggregation Protocol (https://1inch.com/blog/post/1inch-token-pioneering-defi-governance-and-utility) (the Pathfinder routing algorithm), a gas-efficient Limit Order Protocol, and the intent-based Fusion mode are governed by the 1inch DAO through the 1inch.eth Snapshot space (https://snapshot.org/#/1inch.eth) . This makes 1inch a distinct archetype in the DAO directory: where Uniswap (/wiki/daos/organizations/dexs/uniswap-dao) , Curve (/wiki/daos/organizations/dexs/curve-dao) , and Balancer (/wiki/daos/organizations/dexs/balancer-dao) govern the pools that hold liquidity, 1inch governs the layer that routes across them, closer in shape to intent/solver DAOs like CoW DAO (/wiki/daos/organizations/dexs/cow-dao) and the Solana aggregator Jupiter (/wiki/daos/organizations/dexs/jupiter) .

  • Added – Text at Block 3

    Origins: a 60-hour hackathon 1inch began at the ETHGlobal New York hackathon in May 2019 (https://gitcoin.co/case-studies/1inch-from-hackathon-to-decentralized-exchange-powerhouse) , where Sergej Kunz (https://1inch.com/blog/post/meet-1inch-team-sergej-kunz) (now CEO) and Anton Bukov (https://1inch.com/blog/post/meet-1inch-team-anton-bukov-co-founder-and-cto) (now CTO) – competing as the "CryptoManiacs" team – built a working aggregator prototype over roughly 60 hours. The protocol has since routed over $450 billion (https://1inch.com/blog/post/1inch-token-pioneering-defi-governance-and-utility) in cumulative volume across more than ten EVM networks.

  • Added – Text at Block 4

    The 1INCH token The 1INCH governance and utility token (https://1inch.com/blog/post/1inch-token-pioneering-defi-governance-and-utility) launched on 25 December 2020 with a maximum supply of 1.5 billion. On 6 April 2022 the token's mint function was permanently burned, fixing the cap so no further 1INCH can ever be created. The token is distributed across community airdrops, liquidity incentives, the team, investors, and a long-term treasury.

  • Added – Text at Block 5

    Unicorn Power: staking with decay Raw 1INCH balances do not vote. To gain governance weight a holder deposits 1INCH into a time-locked staking contract and receives st1INCH and Unicorn Power (UP) – the unit of influence in the 1inch DAO (https://1inch.com/blog/post/1inch-token-pioneering-defi-governance-and-utility) . The UP granted scales with both the amount staked and the lock duration (up to two years), and it decays over time as the lock unwinds, so sustained influence requires an active, renewed commitment rather than a one-time purchase. On-chain governance parameters set a proposal-submission threshold of 100,000 UP, a quorum of 10,000,000 UP, and a five-day voting window (https://1inch.com/blog/post/1inch-token-pioneering-defi-governance-and-utility) for standard proposals.

  • Added – Text at Block 6

    Two independent delegations 1inch's most distinctive design is that Unicorn Power can be delegated down two separate rails that operate independently: - Governance delegation – UP delegated to a Snapshot delegate (https://snapshot.org/#/1inch.eth) who votes on protocol decisions on the holder's behalf, a form of vote-lock (/wiki/daos/organizations/dexs/curve-dao) representation comparable to vote-escrow (/wiki/dao-governance/concepts/voting/vote-escrow) systems. - Economic delegation – the same UP delegated to a Fusion resolver (https://1inch.com/blog/post/staking-1inch-and-delegating-unicorn-power-a-source-of-rewards-127183a578d9) : professional market makers who settle Fusion (https://help.1inch.com/en/articles/6796085-what-is-1inch-fusion-and-how-does-it-work) orders through gasless Dutch auctions. Resolvers compete for delegated UP, and stakers earn a share of the resolvers' arbitrage profits. The split means the token doubles as a governance right and a yield-bearing stake in the network's market-making layer – a holder can lend their voice to a delegate and their economic weight to a resolver at the same time.

  • Added – Text at Block 7

    What the DAO controls Through Snapshot votes weighted by Unicorn Power, 1INCH stakers hold direct authority over network governance, the DAO treasury, and the parameters of the Fusion Mode Settlement Contract (https://1inch.com/blog/post/1inch-token-pioneering-defi-governance-and-utility) – the contract that clears resolver-settled trades. Treasury management and the calibration of Fusion's fee and auction parameters are therefore live governance questions rather than founder prerogatives.

  • Added – Text at Block 8

    How Caper approaches this 1inch shows a deliberate split between governance weight (Unicorn Power for voting) and economic delegation (Unicorn Power lent to resolvers for yield), with influence that decays unless a holder keeps re-locking. Caper (/wiki/foundations/what-is-a-caper) folds those into a single canonical number: a member's vote weight is (t · v) / (V · T) – their token holdings t multiplied by their accumulated voting history v, over the totals. Holdings are one factor, not the whole story, so a large bag alone cannot capture control (/wiki/governance) without a matching record of showing up to vote. And where 1inch stakers must wait out a time-lock, Caper pairs weight with an exit right (/wiki/markets) : a member can always leave with their proportional share of the treasury rather than being locked in to a decision they lost.