---
title: "DeSci Labs"
url: "https://caper.network/wiki/desci/ecosystem/desci-labs"
updated: 2026-09-06
license: CC-BY-4.0
license_url: "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"
---

# DeSci Labs

| Name | DeSci Labs |
| --- | --- |
| Type | DeSci infrastructure company + [DeSci Foundation](https://www.descifoundation.org/about) (standards steward) |
| Focus | Open, content-addressed scientific publishing & persistent identifiers |
| Founded | Switzerland, July 2021 |
| Founders | Prof. Philipp Koellinger (CEO), Dr. Christopher Hill, Sina Iman |
| Products | [DeSci Nodes / DeSci Publish](https://www.desci.com/publish), [DeSci Codex](https://www.desci.com/blog/how-desci-codex-makes-scientific-research-durable-reusable-and-ai-ready), [dPID](https://www.dpid.org/) |
| Funding | [$6.5M seed](https://startupsmagazine.co.uk/article-desci-labs-raises-65m-transform-scientific-publishing) (29 Aug 2024) |
| Status | 🟢 Active |
| Website | [desci.com](https://www.desci.com) |

## Overview

[DeSci Labs](https://www.desci.com/about) is a Swiss software company building the base infrastructure for [decentralized science](/wiki/desci/what-is-desci) – the open, content-addressed layer beneath the field's publishing and funding platforms. Where BioDAOs such as [VitaDAO](/wiki/desci/ecosystem/vitadao) or [ResearchHub](/wiki/desci/ecosystem/researchhub) coordinate _who funds and reviews_ research, DeSci Labs builds the plumbing that makes a research output durable, versioned, and machine-readable in the first place.

It is the first **infrastructure and standards** organization in this directory rather than a funder or a patient community: its products – [DeSci Nodes](https://www.desci.com/publish), the [dPID](https://www.dpid.org/) identifier protocol, and the [DeSci Codex](https://www.desci.com/blog/how-desci-codex-makes-scientific-research-durable-reusable-and-ai-ready) network – are the components the [decentralized-publishing pillar](/wiki/desci/decentralized-publishing) cites as the tooling under everything else.

## The problem it targets

DeSci Labs was founded on a diagnosis of the traditional scientific record: results are frozen into flat PDFs that strip out the data, code, and provenance, then locked behind a [publishing cartel](/wiki/desci/decentralized-publishing) at margins that dwarf most of tech. CEO Philipp Koellinger frames the deeper cost as a [“replication crisis that is derailing scientific progress”](https://startupsmagazine.co.uk/article-desci-labs-raises-65m-transform-scientific-publishing) – a problem the wiki treats at length in the [reproducibility-crisis](/wiki/desci/reproducibility-crisis) page.

Two failures follow from the PDF-as-unit-of-record model. Citations point at _link-rotting URLs_ rather than the exact bits that were reviewed, so the literature quietly drifts out from under its own references; and the underlying data and code, severed from the paper, cannot be independently re-run. DeSci Labs' answer is to change the unit of publication itself.

## Research objects: DeSci Nodes & DeSci Publish

The core move is to publish a **research object** instead of a document: manuscript, datasets, code, figures, and metadata bundled into one versioned, independently-addressable unit. [DeSci Nodes](https://www.desci.com/publish) (also shipped as [DeSci Publish](https://startupsmagazine.co.uk/article-desci-labs-raises-65m-transform-scientific-publishing), billed as “the first open-source, peer-to-peer platform for scientific publishing”) is the application researchers use to assemble and release these objects, with private drafts, licensing, and transparent version history built in.

The engine is open source: the [desci-labs/nodes](https://github.com/desci-labs/nodes) repository describes Nodes as “secure PID containers for interoperable research objects.” Around it sits a developer surface – `Codex-Lib` for low-level protocol access, `Nodes-Lib` and a `Nodes CLI` for automated publishing – so other DeSci applications can publish to the same network without rebuilding the storage layer.

## dPID: decentralized persistent identifiers

When a Node is published it automatically receives a [dPID](https://www.dpid.org/) (decentralized persistent identifier). Unlike a DOI – a mutable pointer administered by a central registrar – a dPID is built on **content identifiers (CIDs)**, the cryptographic fingerprints used by [IPFS](https://ipfs.tech), so “the same logical object always maps to the exact same sequence of bits.” That guards against [content drift](https://docs.desci.com/create-and-publish/share/persistent-identifier-dpid) and lets a reader cite an individual component of a paper, not just the whole.

dPIDs read like short, human-friendly filepaths with version and history control, resolvable through the [dPID Browser](https://www.dpid.org/) or an open-source HTTP _dPID Resolver_ that bridges the conventional web to decentralized storage. Notably the protocol is a **split responsibility**: per dpid.org it is “Engineering by DeSci Labs & Governance by the DeSci Foundation” – the company writes the code, a separate non-profit stewards the standard.

## DeSci Codex & the Open State repository

[DeSci Codex](https://www.desci.com/blog/how-desci-codex-makes-scientific-research-durable-reusable-and-ai-ready) is the open protocol beneath the app – “a decentralized network for publishing and preserving scientific research objects.” Content is content-addressed and securely replicated across multiple nodes via peer-to-peer resolution, so a published object survives independent of any single service provider. Institutions can run `Codex-Node` backend services to participate in that replication and add durability to the network.

The stated payoff is research that is **durable, reusable, and AI-ready**: because every object carries its data, code, and an auditable provenance chain – who published what, when, and what changed – results become both independently reproducible and directly machine-readable, the container the flat PDF never was. It is the same open-record shift the rest of DeSci makes with [IP-NFTs](/wiki/desci/ip-nfts), applied to the publication itself.

## Company and Foundation: engineering vs. governance

DeSci Labs deliberately separates the venture-funded engineering company from the neutral steward of the standards it depends on. The [DeSci Foundation](https://www.descifoundation.org/about) is a non-profit registered in Canton Zug, Switzerland (CHE-389.450.872, subject to annual Swiss audit) whose mission is to “explore and support improvements in the scientific ecosystem” and to “enfranchise stakeholders” in the emerging field.

The two are organizationally distinct but aligned: Koellinger is the Foundation's president as well as DeSci Labs' CEO, and co-founder Christopher Hill sits on its five-member Executive Board, which works alongside an advisory board of 15+ from academia, blockchain, and open science. Keeping the identifier standard's governance in a separate non-profit – rather than inside the company that could later be acquired or wound down – is a bet on [credible neutrality](/wiki/dao-governance/concepts/fundamentals/governance-minimization) for infrastructure the whole field is meant to build on.

## Funding, team & place in the ecosystem

DeSci Labs closed a [$6.5M seed round on 29 August 2024](https://startupsmagazine.co.uk/article-desci-labs-raises-65m-transform-scientific-publishing), backed by Stride VC, OSS Capital, [Protocol Labs](https://www.protocol.ai), Accomplice, HV Capital, and Holtzbrinck Digital, with the capital earmarked for a “traceable digital scientific record” and the DeSci Publish launch. The team of roughly a dozen engineers and scientists is led by Koellinger (a behavioral-genetics researcher with 17,000+ citations, formerly of the University of Wisconsin–Madison and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam), Hill (a neuro-economist), and Iman (a software engineer previously at Palantir).

Within the wider field DeSci Labs is the layer under the platforms: [ResearchHub](/wiki/desci/ecosystem/researchhub) pays for peer review, [Molecule](/wiki/desci/ecosystem/molecule) and [Bio Protocol](/wiki/desci/ecosystem/bio-xyz) route funding into [BioDAOs](/wiki/desci/desci-daos), and DeSci Nodes plus dPID give all of them a durable, content-addressed way to name and preserve what the science actually produces.

## How Caper approaches this

DeSci Labs is not a governance protocol – it publishes research, not treasuries – but the two share a load-bearing idea: **a decision, or a result, should be a durable, content-addressed record that anyone can audit, not a claim you take on trust.** A dPID pins the exact bits that were reviewed so a citation can't rot out from under itself.

[Caper](/wiki/foundations/what-is-a-caper) makes the equivalent move for what a DAO _does_ with money: every treasury action is a [typed proposal](/wiki/governance/proposals) – a _PAYOUT_ that transfers from the treasury, an _INVEST_ that buys another caper's token, a _DIVEST_ that sells one back, or a _METADATA_ that rewrites its own token's mutable metadata – recorded and executed on-chain rather than settled in a back channel. And it echoes DeSci Labs’ second bet, splitting the neutral standard from the company that builds it – though in Caper the split lands a layer lower down. The [bonding curve](/wiki/markets/bonding-curve)’s cap is pinned by the state package, which is published immutable and which the contract source says no logic version can violate; the curve’s slope constant and the whole fee schedule sit in the swappable logic package, and moving either takes an `UPGRADE` proposal in the $CAPER caper rather than a vote in the caper being repriced. So a caper’s own ballot reaches its treasury and nothing else – not because the market is beyond governance, but because it is beyond _that_ caper’s governance. A research collective that publishes its outputs through DeSci Nodes could fund that work through exactly these typed, auditable proposals. _(Caper mechanics verified against `contracts/core/src/caper_dao.rs` and `contracts/logic/src/lib.rs`.)_